Markets · 1 sources covering this

Domicile Isn't a Real Argument For Citizenship Says Wydra

A divided US Supreme Court upheld the constitutional right of birthright citizenship, rejecting President Donald Trump’s planned restrictions and invalidating a central plank of his immigration agenda. Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito and Neil Gorsuch dissented. "National citizenship was not an independent concept but simply derivative of state citizenship. “Every citizen of a state,” it was often said, was “ipso facto a citizen of the United States.” In these contexts, too, national citi…

Share:X WhatsApp Reddit Facebook LinkedIn Open ↗

Coverage spectrum

1 L · 0 C · 0 R

How 1 sources are covering this

BloombergLean L·2h ago
Domicile Isn't a Real Argument For Citizenship Says Wydra
A divided US Supreme Court upheld the constitutional right of birthright citizenship, rejecting President Donald Trump’s planned restrictions and invalidating a central plank of his immigration agenda. Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito and Neil Gorsuch dissented. "National citizenship was not an independent concept but simply derivative of state citizenship. “Every citizen of a state,” it was often said, was “ipso facto a citizen of the United States.” In these contexts, too, national citi…
Read at Bloomberg →

Embed this bias spectrum on your site

Paste this iframe wherever you'd like the widget to appear. Resizes responsively; no JS required.

<iframe
  src="https://statesidedaily.com/embed/cluster/1275a3d2d39e5d9b1ad43fb663855dbfdfbd1cd3"
  width="100%" height="320"
  style="border:0;max-width:680px"
  loading="lazy"
  title="Domicile Isn't a Real Argument For Citizenship Says Wydra"></iframe>

Domicile Isn't a Real Argument For Citizenship Says Wydra

How 1 sources are covering this