The literary world is celebrating Anthropic's $1.5 billion settlement with authors. But AI firms may still train models on legally purchased books. What does that mean?
<iframe src="https://statesidedaily.com/embed/cluster/f8edbc18f7a48aea3136ea43e2cb1b45af79ed4f" width="100%" height="320" style="border:0;max-width:680px" loading="lazy" title="Authors wary of content ownership despite court ruling on Anthropic case"></iframe>
The literary community is celebrating the final word from the court on a landmark class action copyright infringement lawsuit in which the AI company Anthropic is paying out $1.5 billion to authors for pirating their works. But the ruling does not prevent AI companies from training their AI models on authors' work going forwards as long as they purchase texts legally. What are the implications of this?
The literary world is celebrating Anthropic's $1.5 billion settlement with authors. But AI firms may still train models on legally purchased books. What does that mean?
